|
GROUP 1 |
-
Effects of new slough mouth, how much sediment will it contribute to
beach?
-
Research on kelp beds and reef
-
Why a
deficit in sand
-
Costs
of moving utility lines
-
What
effect does revetment have on downward beaches?
|
|
GROUP 2 |
-
Evaluation of hard and soft solutions from independent experts (not
from seawall engineers)
-
More
input from County staff
-
Cost
and responsibility (agency) for utilities relocation
-
Evaluation of effects of current nourishment project
-
Research on sand movement up coast of Goleta Beach (detailed
bathymetry offshore study)
|
|
GROUP 3 |
-
Build
kelp trellis
-
Scientific study: cost-effective way to study beach erosion-site
specific to Goleta Beach
-
Buy
time-rock revetment, breakwater
-
No
short term solution that doesn’t inhibit long term solution
-
Move
back utility lines
-
Raise
217
-
Alternative transportation-better MTD service-free pass to Goleta
Beach
|
|
GROUP 4 |
-
Need more info on park
uses, users
-
Coastal processes
-
Natural history-long term
historic and future on process of sand movement, sediment deposition
-
Economic
costs/alternatives
-
Kelp restoration prospects
|
|
GROUP 5 |
-
Carrying capacity study
-
Information: study of uses of Goleta Beach
-
Look
at future implications-regional approach
-
Population and habitats-impact study
-
Need
adequate parking for community, make UCSB
-
Remove west end parking-more economical use of parking
-
Remote parking-shuttle
-
Valet
parking for restaurant
-
Remove structures-non-recreational
-
More
outreach to all communities effected, including Chicano and Chumash
communities
|